Kingston HyperX 240GB Review

Written by Harry Butler

December 8, 2011 | 07:53

Companies: #kingston

ATTO Disk Benchmark Results

Website: ATTO Disk Benchmark

Following the introduction of Window 7's improved caching technology, our traditional sequential read/write benchmark, FC -Test, was no longer practical to use, due to data being immediately cached and thus invalidating our copy and read performance figures.

Instead, we've opted for ATTO disk benchmark as a straightforward tool for testing a hard disk or SSD's ability to read and write files of various sizes. The benchmark sequentially writes and reads files varying in size from 0.5KB to 8MB, and can also be adjusted for overlapped I/O and a variety of queue depths. We've tested using the benchmark's default settings, recording 1,024KB file performance.

ATTO's 256MB benchmark uses extremely compressible data, enabling drives that use compression-based storage, such as those based on SandForce's drive controllers, to achieve their absolute maximum performance. However, this rarely translates into real world performance, as the majority of today's data is at least partially compressed.

Sequential Performance


ATTO Disk Benchmark

4KB Compressible Sequential Read Speed

  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 128GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 64GB (Marvell) v0009
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • Kingston Hyper X 240GB
  • Samsung SSD 830 256GB
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Patriot Wildfire 120GB (SandForce 2281)
  • Adata S5111 240GB
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
    • 286
    • 284
    • 283
    • 240
    • 220
    • 198
    • 194
    • 166
    • 164
    • 149
    • 133
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Read Speed

ATTO Disk Benchmark

4KB Compressible Sequential Write Speed

  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
  • Adata S511 240GB
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Kingston Hyper X 240GB
  • Samsung SSD 830 256GB
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial M4 128GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial M4 64GB (Marvell) v0009
    • 280
    • 268
    • 255
    • 234
    • 233
    • 188
    • 188
    • 178
    • 127
    • 101
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Read Speed

ATTO Disk Benchmark

1,024KB Compressible Sequential Read Speed

  • Kingston Hyper X 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • Adata S511 240GB
  • Samsung SSD 830 256GB
  • Crucial M4 128GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 64GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
    • 543
    • 543
    • 539
    • 537
    • 531
    • 530
    • 526
    • 424
    • 368
    • 265
    • 265
    • 258
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Random Read

ATTO Disk Benchmark

1,024KB Compressible Sequential Write Speed

  • Adata S511 240GB
  • Kingston Hyper X 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • Samsung SSD 830 256GB
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial M4 128GB (Marvell) v0009
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • Crucial M4 64GB (Marvell) v0009
    • 516
    • 514
    • 513
    • 397
    • 274
    • 266
    • 233
    • 206
    • 200
    • 197
    • 105
    • 101
0
100
200
300
400
500
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Sequential Write

Read our performance analysis.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04